Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SHELTON v. EEOC

March 16, 1973

Walter S. Shelton, Plaintiff
v.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al., Defendants



The opinion of the court was delivered by: SHARP

SHARP, D.J.:

This is a suit by a federal non-probationary employee who was discharged from his employment without first being provided a formal hearing. Since the plaintiff seeks to enjoin his discharge on the theory that Title 5 U.S.C. § 7501 as applied to him violates the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a three-judge District Court was convened.

At the time of his termination, the plaintiff, Walter S. Shelton, was the District Director of the Seattle District Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter EEOC). He was initially employed by the EEOC on August 29, 1966, as an Equal Employment Officer, Grade GS-12. After several intervening promotions, Mr. Shelton was assigned, on July 11, 1971, to the position of District Director, Seattle District Office, and his grade classification was increased to GS-14.

 By letter dated July 3, 1972, plaintiff was informed that his superior, the Regional Director of the San Francisco Region, proposed to recommend his removal from his position as District Director. This notice detailed numerous specific charges, which may be summarized as a failure to carry out his manifold responsibilities as the highest ranking EEOC officer in this area, including, generally, failure to recruit, to supervise and to follow administrative procedures.

 By letter dated December 5, 1972, plaintiff notified the EEOC that he was appealing the decision to remove him, by following general appeal procedures. Presumably, that agency is presently engaged in processing his appeal through its post-termination procedure, with an independent examiner conducting an adversary-type hearing.

 Plaintiff also filed a complaint and motion in the U.S. District Court seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent his discharge until a motion for a preliminary injunction could be heard. The temporary restraining order was granted on December 8, 1972, and defendant was enjoined from discharging plaintiff prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 12, 1972. A hearing was held on December 12, 1972, and the District Court granted the plaintiff's request to convene a three-judge court but refused to enjoin the defendant from discharging plaintiff. Plaintiff was discharged from the EEOC by notice effective December 13, 1972.

 The thrust of petitioner's argument is that the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States requires an adversary hearing before an impartial decision maker prior to termination for cause. Congress has declared otherwise. Title 5 U.S.C. § 7501:

 
"§ 7501. Cause; procedure; exception
 
(a) An individual in the competitive service may be removed or suspended without pay only for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service.
 
(b) An individual in the competitive service whose removal or suspension without pay is sought is entitled to reasons in writing and to --
 
(1) notice of the action sought and of any charges preferred against him;
 
(2) a copy of the charges;
 
(3) a reasonable time for filing a written answer to the charges, ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.