Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wehrli v. Pagliotti

filed: November 5, 1991.

HANS H. WEHRLI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JAMES PAGLIOTTI; CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS - APPELLEES, HUGH R. MANES, ESQ., REAL-PARTY-IN-INTEREST - APPELLANT



Appeal from D.C. No. CV-86-7574-WDK. {Judge}{Q}Judges{/Q}{/Judge}

Goodwin, Pregerson, and Alarcon, Circuit Judges.

Order

Upon reconsideration, a thorough examination of the record has disclosed an abundance of material that was not included in appellant's brief. Unfortunately, appellees filed no opposition brief nor any other papers before this court to assist us in deciding this matter.

After reviewing the record, particularly the transcripts, we conclude that the district judge exercised commendable restraint in dealing with counsel for both parties. The record establishes that counsel failed to provide the court with the assistance on jury instructions and special verdict forms that judges would normally expect from counsel.

We also conclude that the district court's factual findings regarding the sanctions imposed were not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the opinion filed August 1, 1991 is vacated and ordered withdrawn from publication. The district court's judgment imposing sanctions is AFFIRMED.

19911105

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.