Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gyore v. O'Connell

filed: May 13, 1992.

JOZSEF GYORE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JOSEPH S. O'CONNELL, ET AL. DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JOZSEF GYORE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. JOSEPH S. O'CONNELL, ET AL. DEFENDANT-APPELLEES.



On Appeal From the United States District Court for the Central District of California. D.C. No. CV-89-1847-RSWL, Central California. Ronald S. W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: Tang, Schroeder and Beezer, Circuit Judges

MEMORANDUM

Jozsef Gyore appeals pro se the dismissal of his civil rights action against Joseph O'Connell and several others. He also appeals the denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal and we affirm.

Gyore brought suit claiming that several people conspired to deprive him of property in a prior lawsuit. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing his complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), as to defendants Joseph O'Connell, James Andion, the Law Offices of Joseph S. O'Connell and James Daniel Freemon for failure to prosecute. The district court also correctly determined that Gyore failed to serve the other defendants within the time period set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j). Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing Gyore's complaint.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Gyore leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Disposition

AFFIRMED.

19920513

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.