Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Malasartre

filed*fn*: August 17, 1992.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
CAREY DENNIS MALASARTRE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. D.C. No. CR-91-0317-RG-01. Richard A. Gadbois, Jr., District Judge, Presiding.

Before: Brunetti, Rymer, and Kleinfeld, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

Carey Dennis Malasarte appeals his sentence imposed under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines") for two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Malasarte contends that his sentence should not have been enhanced under the Guidelines' career offender provision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.*fn1

Under the Guidelines, a defendant is a career offender if, among other requirements, the defendant has at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Malasarte argues that the use of his prior convictions to enhance his sentence violated due process because he had no opportunity "to either deny or admit the prior convictions." Malasarte asserts that prior convictions should be alleged in the indictment so that, in the event the defendant contests the validity of the conviction, a trial can be conducted to resolve the issue.

The government is not required to charge prior felonies that might be used to enhance a sentence under section 4B1.1. United States v. McDougherty, 920 F.2d 569, 574 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 1119 (1991); see also United States v. Alvarez, 960 F.2d 830, 836 (9th Cir. 1992) (no requirement that enhancements under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) be charged by indictment). Moreover, due process does not require the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt a defendant's prior convictions. McDougherty, 920 F.2d at 575. The fact of a defendant's prior convictions need only be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Id.

Here, Malasarte's presentence report ("PSR") clearly set forth his criminal history, including his prior felony convictions. See id. (defendant's PSR and copies of conviction records supports validity of prior convictions).*fn2 Malasarte had the opportunity to challenge the validity of his prior convictions before sentencing by filing written objections to his PSR and failed to do so. See id.; see also Alvarez, 960 F.2d at 836 (defendant had adequate notice that prior convictions would be used to enhance sentence). At sentencing, Malasarte did not contest the fact of his prior convictions. The district court's sentence was proper. See McDougherty, 920 F.2d at 575.

AFFIRMED.

Disposition

AFFIRME ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.