Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Meyers Way Development Limited Partnership v. University Savings Bank

October 2, 1996

MEYERS WAY DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; MEYERS-CONTEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY MEYERS-CONTEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ITS GENERAL PARTNER; AND MEYERS-CONTEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY CONTEK, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, ITS GENERAL PARTNER; VALENTINS RUPEIKS AND NOREEN RUPEIKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE; MICHAEL NEESER AND JANE DOE NEESER, HUSBAND AND WIFE; AND CAROL J. JARDINE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GARY N. JARDINE, PETITIONERS,
v.
UNIVERSITY SAVINGS BANK, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, WILLIAM N. APPEL, ET UX., ET AL., PETITIONERS, ORDAL & JONES, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION; ROGER W. JONES, TRUSTEE, RESPONDENT, JOHN Y. SATO, ET UX., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



C/A NO. 33425-5-I (33590-1 consol. w/33425-5-I). Original Opinion of February 20, 1996,

Justice Talmadge recused and Justice Alexander sat as Justice Pro Tem

ORDER

All five members of Department I of the Court (Justice Talmadge recused and Justice Alexander sat as Justice Pro Tem) considered the matters set on its October 1, 1996, Motion Calendar, and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. Therefore, Chief Justice Barbara Durham directed that this order be entered:

IT IS ORDERED:

That consideration of the Petition for Review is continued to the November 14, 1996, En Banc Conference.

19961002 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.