Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hazel v. Beek

April 28, 1997

LOIS HAZEL, RESPONDENT,
v.
LEONARD VAN BEEK AND MARJORIE VAN BEEK, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DBA J-LEN CONSTRUCTION, APPELLANTS.



Appeal from Superior Court of Whatcom County. Docket No: 83-2-01150-3. Date filed: 10/28/94. Judge signing: Hon. Michael F. Moynihan. Amended Opinion of February 18, 1997,

Authored by Ronald E. Cox. Concurring: Faye C. Kennedy, H. Joseph Coleman.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Cox

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CHANGING OPINION

Respondent Lois Hazel having filed a motion for reconsideration herein, and the court having considered the motion has determined that the motion should be denied; Now, therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the

On page 3 of the slip opinion, under the heading "Timeliness of Objections," strike the portion of the text beginning with the third sentence that begins, "She asserts that the objections . . .," through the end of the paragraph, including footnotes 1 and 2.

Substitute in place of the stricken test the sentence, "We disagree."

The footnotes in the opinion shall be renumbered accordingly.

Dated this 28th day of April 1997.

19970428 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.