Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pugh v. Dreyfus

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

September 10, 2013

BOB A PUGH, Plaintiff,
v.
SUSAN DREYFUS, Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO NOTED FOR:OCTOBER 11, 2013 GRANT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANT

J. RICHARD CREATURA, Magistrate Judge.

The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action to United States Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura. The Court's authority for the referral is 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Magistrate Judge Rules MJR3 and MJR4.

The Court recommends granting defendants' motion asking that the Court replace defendant Susan Dreyfus, former Secretary of the Department of Social Health Services, with Kevin Quigley, the current Secretary (ECF No. 20). The authority for this substitution of defendants is Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(d). Plaintiff has not filed any opposition to the motion.

FED. R. Civ. P. 25(d) states:

(d) Public Officers; Death or Substitution from Office.
An action does not abate when a public officer who is a party in a official capacity dies, resigns, or otherwise ceases to hold office while the action is pending. The officer's successor is automatically substituted as a party. Later proceedings should be in the substituted party's name, but any misnomer not affecting the parties' substantial rights must be disregarded. The court may order substitution at any time, but the absence of such an order does not affect the substitution.

Given this authority, and the lack of opposition to the motion, the Court recommends granting defendants' motion. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of de novo review by the district judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on October 11, 2013, as noted in the caption.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.