ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 161), and Plaintiff James O'Neil Wiggin's ("Wiggin") objections to the R&R (Dkt. 164).
On December 16, 2013, Judge Strombom issued the R&R recommending that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Wiggin's claims for violations of the Eight Amendment based on allegations of inadequate medical care and inadequate conditions of confinement. Dkt. 161. On December 26, 2013, Wiggin filed objections. Dkt. 164. On January 6, 2014, Defendants responded. Dkt. 165.
The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (b)(3).
In this case, Wiggin fails to meet the high burden to state a constitutional claim for relief. After review of the file, it is clear that (1) Wiggin has received extensive medical treatment and numerous consultations and (2) Wiggin merely disagrees with the medical recommendations. Such disagreement, however, is insufficient to state a valid constitutional claim for cruel and unusual punishment. Contrary to Wiggin's objection, Judge Strombom did not resolve questions of fact in her R&R; instead she found that Wiggin had failed to show that a question of fact exists on the issue of whether any Defendant had acted with deliberate indifference to Wiggin's serious medical needs. The Court agrees with Judge Strombom's conclusion. Therefore, the Court having considered the R&R, Wiggin's objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:
(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;
(2) Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;
(3) Wiggin's in forma pauperis status is ...