Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bell v. Uribe

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

January 21, 2014

TERRY LEE BELL, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
DOMINGO URIBE, JR., Warden, Respondent-Appellant. NATALIE DEMOLA, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
JAVIER CAVAZOS, Acting Warden, Respondent-Appellant

Page 858

Appeal fro the United States District Court for the Central District of California. D.C. No. 5:08-cv-01913-JST-SS, D.C. No. 5:10-cv-00014-JST-SS. Josephine Staton Tucker, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: Richard C. Tallman, Richard R. Clifton, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

Page 859

ORDER

The opinion filed on September 5, 2013, is amended. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc filed in appeal number 11-56771.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc in appeal number 11-56771 are DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.