United States District Court, W.D. Washington
November 19, 2014
JAMAL J ELLIS, Plaintiff,
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant
Noted for: December 12, 2014.
Jamal J Ellis, Plaintiff, Pro se, CLALLAM BAY, WA.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge.
The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action to United States Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (A) and (B), and local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR1, MJR3 and MJR4.
On September 26, 2014, the Clerk's Office sent plaintiff a deficiency letter telling him to cure the defects in his in forma pauperis application (Dkt. 2). The letter gave plaintiff until October 27, 2014, to comply (Dkt. 2). One of the defects in his application is that plaintiff has failed to provide a prison trust account statement. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) (2) states:
A prisoner seeking to bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding without prepayment of fees or security therefor, in addition to filing the affidavit filed under paragraph (1), shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined.
The Court must receive this statement from a prisoner seeking to proceed in forma pauperis. See, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (2). As of November 19, 2014, plaintiff has not responded to the letter from the Clerk's Office and the time allotted by the Court for compliance has elapsed. The Court, therefore, recommends denial of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissal of this action if plaintiff does not pay the full four-hundred dollar filing fee within thirty days of the Court accepting this Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of de novo review by the district judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on December 12, 2014, as noted in the caption.