Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hegewald v. Glebe

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma

January 6, 2015

MICHAEL HEGEWALD, Petitioner,
v.
PATRICK GLEBE, Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 16), and Petitioner Michael Hegewald's ("Hegewald") objections to the R&R (Dkt. 17).

On October 30, 2014, Judge Creatura issued the R&R recommending that the Court deny Hegewald's petition because it is time-barred and Hegewald is not entitled to equitable tolling. Dkt. 16. On November 17, 2014, Hegewald filed objections arguing that he is entitled to equitable tolling. Dkt. 17. On November 25, 2014, the Government responded to the objections. Dkt. 18.

The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3).

In this case, Hegewald argues that he is entitled to equitable tolling because he has a mental impairment and because he was unable to secure legal assistance to file the petition in a timely manner. Dkt. 17 at 4. Hegewald offered these same assertions to Judge Creatura and they were rejected based on a lack of evidence to meet the high bar of equitable tolling. See Dkt. 16 at 4-5. The Court also rejects Hegewald's justifications for failing to timely file because Hegewald has failed to meet the high burden of establishing that he is entitled to equitable tolling. Neither reason put forth by Hegewald shows extraordinary circumstances that prevented him from timely filing his petition. Therefore, the Court having considered the R&R, Petitioner's objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;
(2) The Court DENIES Hegewald's petition;
(3) The Court DENIES a Certificate of Appealability; and
(4) This action is DISMISSED.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.