United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MARSHA J. PECHMAN, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 2, 3.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Objections, and the related record, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, and DISMISSES the action without prejudice for failure to satisfy the imminent danger requirement for three-strikes litigants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, the Court must resolve de novo any part of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation that has been properly objected to and may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff objects to Judge Donohue's Report and Recommendation on the basis that he is a pre-trial detainee and a foreign national. (Dkt. No. 3.)
First, Plaintiff is not a pre-trial detainee; Plaintiff was convicted of attempted rape and first-degree burglary and was sentenced to an indeterminate sentence of 240 months to life in prison. See State v. Demos, 94 Wn.2d 733 (1980). Second, Plaintiff does not explain how or why his alleged status as a foreign national would allow him to proceed in forma pauperis where 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) does not. The Court concurs with Judge Donohue's analysis and suggested disposition of the relevant issues, and therefore ADOPTS the Report ...