Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

A. H. Lundberg Associates, Inc. v. TSI, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

March 29, 2017

A.H. Lundberg Associates, Inc. and Lundberg, LLC, Plaintiffs,
v.
TSI, Inc., Defendant.

          LANE POWELL PC By Tiffany Scott Connors Randall P. Beighle, Brian Bodine, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lundberg

          CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN, P.S. By Emilia L. Sweeney Kenneth W. Hart, Attorneys for TSI, Inc.

          [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

          Honorable James L. Robart Judge

         THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Exemplary Damages, Attorney's Fees, and Injunctive Relief, filed October 13, 2016. (Dkt. #214) This Court ordered that the parties submit proposed language and supplemental briefing to assist the court in determining the temporal and substantive scope of a permanent injunction. (Dkt. 271 *SEALED*). After the parties filed a joint statement on injunctive relief (Dkt. #274), the parties continued to meet and confer and reached an agreement as to the following provisions regarding injunctive relief. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and papers on file, including the parties' stipulated proposed language:

         It is now ORDERED that parties' stipulated order for injunctive relief is GRANTED as follows:

         (1) Defendant and its agents, servants, employees, and attorneys (the "Restrained Parties"), are hereby RESTRAINED and ENJOINED as follows:

         (a) The Restrained Parties shall not disclose or use, include or incorporate Lundberg's Wet Electrostatic Precipitator ("WESP")Trade Secrets for six months from the date of this Order in the design or manufacture of a WESP. Lundberg's WESP "Trade Secrets" are defined as follows:

         (i) Lundberg's diameters and measurements of the spherical washer assembly that differ from that developed at Geoenergy International, Inc. (hereinafter "GIC"), and which enjoined diameters and measurements are shown in Trial Exhibit 430, page 1;

         (ii) Lundberg's diameters, measurements, and thicknesses of the electrode body that differ from that developed at GIC, and which enjoined measurements and thicknesses are shown in Trial Exhibit 49, page 1;

         (iii) Lundberg's spacing, gauges, diameters, and vertices of electrode discs that differ from that developed at GIC, and which enjoined spacing, gauges, diameters are shown in the Trial Exhibit 49, page 1 and 50, page 1;

         (iv) Lundberg's surface finish of the spherical washers that differs from that developed at GIC, and which enjoined surface finish is shown in Trial Exhibit 430, page 1;

         (v) Lundberg's number, measurements, arrangement, and layout of tubes that differ from that developed at GIC, and which enjoined number, measurements, arrangement and layout of tubes are detailed in Trial Exhibit 344, pages 38 and 39, and as further identified in Appendix A ___

         (vi) Lundberg's execution and design of tube cooling as specifically ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.