Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Trump

United States District Court, W.D. Washington

October 26, 2017

STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF MARYLAND; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF NEW YORK; and STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ELAINE C. DUKE, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security; REX W, TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.

          BOB FERGUSON, WSBA #26004 Attorney General of Washington NOAH G. PURCELL, WSBA #43492 Solicitor General COLLEEN M, MELODY, WSBA #42275 Civil Rights Unit Chief ANNE E. EGELER, WSBA #20258 Deputy Solicitor General MARSHA CHIEN, WSBA #47020 PATRICIO A. MARQUEZ, WSBA #47693 Assistant Attorneys General XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California ANGELA SIERRA Senior Assistant Attorney General THOMAS S. PATTERSON Senior Assistant Attorney General Supervising Deputy Attorney General ENRIQUE A. MONAGAS Deputy Attorney General ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General BRIAN E. FROSH Attorney General of Maryland STEVEN M. SULLIVAN Solicitor General Federal Bar No. 24930 ROBERT A. SCOTT Assistant Attorney General MAURA HEALEY Attorney General of Massachusetts ELIZABETH N. DEWAR State Solicitor GENEVIEVE C. NADEAU Chief, Civil Rights Division JESSE M. BOODOO Assistant Attorney General ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General of the State of New York LOURDES M. ROSADO Bureau Chief, Civil Rights Bureau SANIA W. KHAN Assistant Attorney General Office of the New York State Attorney ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM Attorney General of Oregon SCOTT J. KAPLAN, WSBA #49377 Senior Assistant Attorney General Oregon Department of Justice Attorneys for Plaintiff

          CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General Director, Federal Programs Branch JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch MICHELLE R. BENNETT DANIEL SCHWEI Senior Trial Counsel U.S. Department of Justice Attorneys for Defendant.

          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

          JAMES L. ROBART, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to Local Rule 10(g), Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

         1, Plaintiffs amended their complaint on October 16, 2017 to challenge Proclamation No. 9645, Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats, 82 Fed. Reg, 45, 161 (Sept. 27, 2017). See Third Am. Compl, ECF No. 198. Absent an extension of time, Defendants' response to the Third Amended Complaint is due on October 30, 2017. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).

         2. On October 11, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO"), asking the Court to temporarily enjoin certain provisions of the Proclamation. See ECF No. 195. The Court subsequently entered a schedule for briefing the motion. See ECF No. 197. Pursuant to that schedule, Defendants filed their opposition to Plaintiffs' TRO motion on October 23,, 2017. See ECF No. 205, Plaintiffs' reply in support of their TRO motion is due on October 26, 2017, and the Court has set a hearing on the motion for October 30, 2017. See ECF No. 197. Following receipt of the briefing and hearing schedule, Plaintiffs requested that the Court treat their motion for a TRO as a motion for preliminary injunction. ECF No. 200.

         3. The parties agree that Defendants' deadline to respond to the Third Amended Complaint should be extended until after the Court resolves Plaintiffs' TRO motion and any subsequent motion for preliminary injunction.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, subject to the Court's approval, that:

         A. Defendants' deadline to respond to the Third Amended Complaint shall be extended until 14 days after the Court enters an order resolving both Plaintiffs' TRO motion and any subsequent preliminary injunction motion.

         ORDER

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.