Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mays v. Bishop

United States District Court, W.D. Washington

December 5, 2017

DAVID E. MAYS, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
HANS E. BISHOP, RICHARD D. KLAUSNER, ROBERT T. NELSEN, HOWARD H. PIEN, HAL V. BARRON, THOMAS O. DANIEL, ANTHONY B. EVNIN, MARY AGNES WILDEROTTER, MARC TESSIER-LAVIGNE, and STEVEN D. HARR, Defendants, and JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC., Nominal Defendant. PAUL SZOLLOSI, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
HANS E. BISHOP, RICHARD D. KLAUSNER, ROBERT T. NELSEN, HOWARD H. PIEN, HAL V. BARRON, THOMAS O. DANIEL, ANTHONY B. EVNIN, MARY AGNES WILDEROTTER, MARC TESSIERLAVIGNE, STEVEN D. HARR and MARK J. GILBERT, Defendants, and JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC., Nominal Defendant

          ZWERLING, SCHACHTER & ZWERLING, LLP, Dan Drachler (WSBA #27728), Counsel for Plaintiffs

          HARWOOD FEFFER LLP Robert I. Harwood (pro hac vice) Benjamin I. Sachs-Michaels (pro hac vice)

          GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY, LLP Robert V. Prongay Lesley F. Portnoy, Counsel for Plaintiff David E. Mays

          THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. Robert B. Weiser Brett D. Stecker (pro hac vice) James M. Ficaro (pro hac vice), Counsel for Plaintiff Paul Szollosi

          WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, PC, Gregory L. Watts, WSBA #43995, Attorney for Defendants

          STIPULATED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED ACTIONS AND APPOINT CO-LEAD COUNSEL AND LIAISON COUNSEL

          RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         WHEREAS, on September 8, 2017, David E. Mays (“Mays”) filed a stockholder derivative complaint in this Court against defendants Hans E. Bishop, Richard D. Klausner, Robert T. Nelsen, Howard H. Pien, Hal V. Barron, Thomas O. Daniel, Anthony B. Evnin, Mary Agnes Wilderotter, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, and Steven D. Harr, styled Mays v. Bishop, et al., 2:17-cv-01356-RSM (the “Mays Action”);

         WHEREAS, on November 6, 2017, Paul Szollosi (together with Mays, “Plaintiffs”) filed a stockholder derivative complaint in this Court against the defendants in the Mays Action, with the addition of Mark J. Gilbert (collectively, “Defendants”), styled Szollosi v. Bishop, et al., 2:17-cv-01665-RSL (the “Szollosi Action, ” and together with the Mays Action, the “Actions”);

         WHEREAS, on November 7, 2017, in the Mays Action the Court so-ordered a stipulation filed by the parties on November 2, 2017 setting Defendants' time to respond to the complaint, vacating discovery deadlines, and setting a briefing schedule for Defendants' motion to transfer;

         WHEREAS, Defendants have waived service in the Mays Action and anticipate waiving service in the Szollosi Action;

         WHEREAS, the Actions arise out of the same transactions and occurrences, involve the same or substantially similar issues of law and fact, and therefore, the Actions should be consolidated for all purposes into a single consolidated action (“the Consolidated Derivative Action”);

         WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants agree that consolidation is appropriate;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have met and conferred and have agreed that: (1) the law firms of Harwood Feffer LLP (“Harwood Feffer”) and the Weiser Law Firm, P.C. (“Weiser Law Firm”) should be appointed as Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel in the Consolidated Derivative Action; and

         (3) the law firm of Zwerling, Schachter & Zwerling, LLP (“Zwerling Schachter”) should be appointed as Liaison ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.