Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hart v. CF Arcis VII LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

February 2, 2018

LAWRENCE HART, CLYDE STEPHEN LEWIS, JAMES PRESTI, and MICHAEL RALLS, individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
CF ARCIS VII LLC d/b/a THE CLUB AT SNOQUALMIE RIDGE, d/b/a TPC AT SNOQUALMIE RIDGE, and d/b/a SNOQUALMIE RIDGE GOLF CLUB,, Defendants.

          Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Attorneys for the Arcis Defendants, Stephen M. Rummage, Rebecca J. Francis

          Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Adrienne D. McEntee, Beth E. Terrell

          STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING NOTING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS [DKT. 10]

          RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Plaintiffs and Defendants CF Arcis VII LLC, CF Arcis IV Holdings, LLC, Arcis Equity Partners, LLC, and Blake Walker (the “Arcis Defendants”), by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

         1. On January 19, 2018, the Arcis Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Dkt. 10. The Arcis Defendants noted the motion for consideration on Friday, February 16, 2018. Dkt. 10; LCR 7(d)(3).

         2. Under LCR 7(d)(3), Plaintiffs' response is due Monday, February 12, 2018, and the Arcis Defendants' reply is due Friday, February 16, 2018. LCR 7(d)(3).

         3. Subject to the Court's approval, the parties have agreed to adjust the briefing schedule and noting date to allow additional time to respond to the pending motion and to accommodate previously committed travel schedules of counsel for all parties. For the same reasons, the parties have also agreed to ask the Court to defer initial case deadlines by 45 days. In agreeing to extend these deadlines, the parties do not intend to limit Plaintiffs' right to amend pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(B).

         4. The parties therefore ask that the Court adjust the case schedule and briefing deadlines and noting date as follows:

Event

Existing Deadline

New Deadline

Noting date for Motion to Dismiss

Friday, February 16, 2018

Friday, April 13, 2018

Plaintiffs' Response to the Motion to Dismiss or Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint

Monday, February 12, 2018

Monday, March 26, 2018

Arcis Defendants' Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss (if no amendment)

Friday, February 16, 2018

Friday, April 13, 2018

Rule 26(f) Conference

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Monday, March 19, 2018

Initial Disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1)

Thursday, February 8, 2018

Monday, March 26, 2018

Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan under Rule 26(f) and LCR 26(f)

Thursday, February 15, 2018

Monday, April 5, 2018

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         ORDER

         Based on the foregoing Stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the noting date on the Motion to Dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the briefing schedule on the Motion and/or the deadline for filing a Second Amended ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.