Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hart v. CF Arcis VII LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

March 27, 2018

LAWRENCE HART, CLYDE STEPHEN LEWIS, JAMES PRESTI, and MICHAEL RALLS, individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
CF ARCIS VII LLC d/b/a THE CLUB AT SNOQUALMIE RIDGE, d/b/a TPC AT SNOQUALMIE RIDGE, and d/b/a SNOQUALMIE RIDGE GOLF CLUB, et al., Defendants.

          Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Attorneys for the Arcis Defendants Stephen M. Rummage, WSBA #11168 Rebecca J. Francis, WSBA #41196

          Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs Adrienne D. McEntee, WSBA #34061 Beth E. Terrell, WSBA #26759

          Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Attorneys for the Arcis Defendants Stephen M. Rummage, WSBA #11168 Rebecca J. Francis, WSBA #41196

          STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES

          RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         Plaintiffs and Defendants CF Arcis VII LLC, CF Arcis IV Holdings, LLC, Arcis Equity Partners, LLC, and Blake Walker (the “Arcis Defendants”), by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

         1. On February 5, 2018, the Court, upon the parties' stipulation, entered an Order various deadlines on Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss, the Rule 26(f) conference, Initial Disclosures, and the Joint Status Report, as well as a deadline for Plaintiffs to file any amended complaint. Dkt. 15.

         2. Since then, the parties have focused on informal resolution discussions. Those discussions continue, and the parties expect they will know whether such discussions will be successful by April 9, 2018. If resolution discussions fail to succeed, Plaintiffs intend to amend their complaint, rendering the pending Motion to Dismiss and noting date moot. As a result, the parties stipulate and agree to ask the Court to strike the noting date for the pending Motion to Dismiss, and to extend the remaining deadlines in the Order as follows:

Event

Existing Deadline

New Deadline

Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint

Monday, March 26, 2018

Monday, April 9, 2018

Rule 26(f) Conference

Monday, March 19, 2018

Monday, April 16, 2018

Initial Disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1)

Monday, March 26, 2018

Monday, April 23, 2018

Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan under Rule 26(f) and LCR 26(f)

Thursday, April 5, 2018

Monday, April 23, 2018

Defendants' Response to the Second Amended Complaint

N/A

Thursday, May 10, 2018

         Event Existing Deadline New Deadline Plaintiffs' Second Amended Monday, March 26, 2018 Monday, April 9, 2018 Complaint Rule 26(f) Conference Monday, March 19, 2018 Monday, April 16, 2018 Initial Disclosures under Monday, March 26, 2018 Monday, April 23, 2018 Rule 26(a)(1)

         Combined Joint Status Thursday, April 5, 2018 Monday, April 23, 2018 Report and Discovery Plan under Rule 26(f) and LCR 26(f) Defendants' Response to the N/A Thursday, May 10, 2018 Second Amended Complaint 3. If Defendants respond to the Second Amended Complaint with a Rule 12 motion, the parties agree to propose a briefing schedule and noting date on the motion.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         ORDER

         Based on the foregoing Stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the case deadlines ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.