Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Vopnford v. Wellcare Health Plans

United States District Court, W.D. Washington

April 10, 2018

LINDA VOPNFORD, Plaintiff,
v.
WELLCARE HEALTH PLANS, a Florida Corporation, headquartered in Florida with offices in Washington, and parent company of COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC, D/B/A WELLCARE, previously known as WINDSOR HEALTH GROUP/WINDSOR HEALTH PLAN, formerly owned by MUNICH Re and also doing business as OLYMPIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND STERLING LIFE INSURANCE, formerly owned by AON, doing business as OLYMPIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC, a Florida Corporation, FRANK WEBSTER, and TOM CAHILL. Defendants.

          Lawrence A. Hildes Attorneys for Plaintiff.

          Peter A. Milianti Attorneys for Defendant.

          Nathaniel L. Taylor Attorneys for Defendant.

          STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

          The Honorable James L. Rooart United States District Court Judge.

         1: PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

         Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information under seal.

         2. "CONFIDENTIAL" MATERIAL

         "Confidential" material shall include the following documents and tangible things produced or otherwise exchanged: Plaintiffs medical records and other personnel records and records containing private and confidential information relating to third parties, including information relating to salaries, benefits, job duties and other confidential information of Defendant Comprehensive Health Management, Inc.'s employees.

         3. SCOPE

         The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material.

         However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise.

         4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL

         4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement.

         4.2 Disclosure of "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items.

         Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any confidential material only to:

(a) the receiving party's counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;
(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including in house counsel) of the receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, unless the parties agree that a particular document or material produced ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.