Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

LVB-Ogden Marketing LLC v. Bingham

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

April 27, 2018

LVB-OGDEN MARKETING, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID S. BINGHAM, SHARON BINGHAM, CHRISTOPHER BINGHAM, CHERISH BINGHAM, KELLY BINGHAM, BINGO INVESTMENTS, LLC, CCRB ENTERPRISES, LLC, PARK PLACE MOTORS, LTD., HYTECH POWER, INC., CICILIA ELALI f/k/a CICILIA PARK, HENRY DEAN, in his individual capacity and as Trustee for the SHARON GRAHAM BINGHAM 2007 TRUST, and BGH HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendants.

          William R. Squires, III, CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER FOGG & MOORE LLP, Jonathan J. Faria, Tammy A. Tsoumas, Heather F. Canner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Jeffrey L. Willian, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff, LVB-Ogden Marketing LLC.

          Scott B. Henrie, WILLIAMS, KASTNER & GIBBS PLLC, Attorneys for Defendants Henry Dean, as Trustee of the Sharon Graham Bingham 2007 Trust, Park Place Motors, Ltd. and HyTech Power, Inc.

          R. Bruce Johnston, Emanuel Jacobowitz, JOHNSTON JACOBOWITZ & ARNOLD, PC, Attorneys for Defendants, Bingham, BINGO Investments LLC and CCRB Enterprises LLC.

          Dennis J. McGlothin, Robert J. Cadranell, WESTERN WASHINGTON LAW GROUP, PLLC, Attorneys for Defendants Henry Dean, in his individual capacity, Cicilia Elali and BGH Holdings, LLC.

          R. Bruce Johnston, Emanuel Jacobowitz, Nathan J. Arnold, JOHNSTON JACOBOWITZ & ARNOLD, Attorneys for Defendants, Bingham, BINGO Investments LLC and CCRB Enterprises LLC.

          STIPULATION FOR AND ORDER AMENDING INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES

          Thomas S. Zilly United States District Judge.

         The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly Whereas, the Court issued its Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement (Dkt. No. 19) on February 28, 2018, which set forth the following Initial Scheduling Dates:

Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference

04/16/2018

Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1)

04/30/2018

Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 26(f)

04/30/2018

         Whereas, the Court issued Minute Order (Dkt. No. 68) on April 4, 2018, which, amongst other things, extended the deadline to confer under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) from April 16, 2018 to May 3, 2018, with all other deadlines remaining the same;

         Whereas, the parties require additional time and therefore are in agreement that the deadlines for: (i) the service of initial disclosures and (ii) the filing of the combined joint status report and discovery plan should be extended to May 17, 2018, following the Rule 26(f) conference and the hearing on the pending motions, the Parties respectfully request an Order that provides for the following deadlines:

FRCP 26(f) Conference

05/03/2018

Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1)

05/17/2018

Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 26(f)

05/17/2018

         BASED ON THE FOREGOING STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Court sets forth the following Initial Scheduling Dates:

Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference

05/03/2018

Deadline for Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1)

05/17/2018

Deadline for Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 26(f)

05/17/2018


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.