Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Hankins

United States District Court, E.D. Washington

June 19, 2018

Adam Loren Hankins

          Asst. U.S. Attorney: Matthew F. Duggan

          PETITION FOR WARRANT OR SUMMONS FOR OFFENDER UNDER SUPERVISION

          The Honorable Justin L. Quackenbush, Senior U.S. District Judge

         PETITIONING THE COURT

         To incorporate the violation(s) contained in this petition in future proceedings with the violation(s) previously reported to the Court on 06/01/2018.

         The probation officer believes that the offender has violated the following condition(s) of supervision:

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance
2 Special Condition # 16: You shall abstain from the use of illegal controlled substances, and shall submit to urinalysis testing (which may include urinalysis or sweat patch), as directed by the supervising officer, but no more than 6 tests per month, in order to confirm continued abstinence from these substances.
Supporting Evidence: On December 28, 2017, supervision commenced in this matter. That same day, Mr. Hankins completed a supervision intake. The conditions of supervision were reviewed with him and he signed a copy of the conditions of supervised release, acknowledging an understanding of the conditions, which included the above-noted special condition number 16.
Mr. Hankins violated the terms of his supervised release by failing to appear for a urinalysis test on or about June 1, 2018.
On June 4, 2018, the undersigned officer was notified that Mr. Hankins failed to appear for a random urinalysis test at Pioneer Counseling Services. Mr. Hankins was contacted by the undersigned and directed to immediately report for urinalysis testing.
That same day, Mr. Hankins reported. He indicated a car fell on him on May 30, 2018, and he stayed home to rest all day, June 1, 2018. He stated, he must have forgotten to call the drug testing line.
3 Standard Condition #3: The defendant shall answer truthfully all inquires by the probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer.
Supporting Evidence: On December 28, 2017, supervision commenced in this matter. That same day, Mr. Hankins completed a supervision intake. The conditions of supervision were reviewed with him and he signed a copy of the conditions of supervised release, acknowledging an understanding of the conditions, which included the above-noted standard condition number 3. In addition, the substance abuse testing instructions were read to Mr. Hankins, which includes: You are not to alter the sample either directly or indirectly. Adulteration is the intentional manipulation of urine sample in order to pass a drug screening test. In addition to testing for controlled substances, each sample is subject to testing for adulteration both on-site and via laboratory confirmation.
Mr. Hankins violated the terms of his supervised release by submitting to a urinalysis test that was determined to be a dilute ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.