Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Tahim

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

April 8, 2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
JASVIT S. TAHIM, Defendant.

          FOR PLAINTIFF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ANNETTE HAYES United States Attorney KAYLA C. STAHMAN, CA #228931 Assistant United States Attorney.

          GUSTAV W. EYLER Acting Director Consumer Protection Branch Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch Trial Attorney Counsel for United States of America.

          CONSENT DECREE AND FINAL JUDGMENT

          THOMAS S. ZILLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         Plaintiff, United States of America (“Plaintiff”), commenced the above-captioned action in this Court with a complaint pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1345, alleging that Defendant, Jasvit S. Tahim, is committing or about to commit a banking law violation as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3322(d), including international money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B).

         Plaintiff and Defendant, pro se, wish to resolve Plaintiff's allegations without litigation and jointly request and consent to the entry of this Consent Decree and Final Judgment (“Consent Decree”) without Defendant's admission of liability or wrongdoing. Defendant agrees to waive service of the Summons and the Complaint.

         Defendant has entered into this Consent Decree freely and without coercion. Defendant further acknowledges that he has read the provisions of this Consent Decree, understands them, and is prepared to abide by them.

         IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED, AND DECREED as follows:

         1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter and the parties pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1345 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c).

         2. Defendant neither admits nor denies the allegations in the Complaint. Only for purposes of this action, Defendant admits the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction.

         3. For purposes of this Consent Decree:

a. “Defendant” means Jasvit S. Tahim.
b. “Person” means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, or any other entity.
c. “Funds” include any currency, check, money order, stored value card, stored value card numbers, bank wire transmission, or other monetary value.
d. “Tech support business” refers to any person that claims to provide security or technical support for computer or mobile devices or computer or ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.