Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hailo Technologies LLC v. Anker Innovations Ltd.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

June 28, 2019

HAILO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
ANKER INNOVATIONS LIMITED, Defendant.

          ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, AND EARLY SETTLEMENT IN A PATENT CASE

         I. INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES

         The Court SETS the following dates for initial disclosure and submission of the Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan:

Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference: 8/27/19
Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26 (a)(1): 9/10/19
Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f), Local Civil Rule 26(f), and Local Patent Rule 110: 9/10/19

         The deadlines above may be extended only by the Court. Any request for an extension should be made by telephone to Karen Dews, Judicial Assistant, at 206-370-8830. If defendants have appeared, the parties are directed to meet and to confer before contacting the Court to request an extension.

         If this case involves claims which are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify Karen Dews, Judicial Assistant, at 206-370-8830.

         II. JOINT STATUS REPORT & DISCOVERY PLAN

         All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to confer and provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan (the “Report”) by September 10, 2019. This conference shall be by direct and personal communication, whether that be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. The Report will be used in setting a schedule for the prompt completion of the case. It must contain the following information by corresponding paragraph numbers:

         1. A statement of the nature and complexity of the case.

         2. A proposed deadline for the joining of additional parties.

         3. The parties have the right to consent to assignment of this case to a fulltime United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule MJR 13, to conduct all proceedings. The Western District of Washington assigns a wide range of cases to Magistrate Judges. The Magistrate Judges of this District thus have significant experience in all types of civil matters in our court. Additional information about our District's Magistrate Judges can be found at www.wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties should indicate whether they agree that a Magistrate Judge may conduct all proceedings including trial and the entry of judgment. When responding to this question, the parties should respond “yes” or “no.” Individual party responses should not be provided. A “yes” response should be indicated only if all parties consent. Otherwise, a “no” response should be provided.

         4. A discovery plan that states, by corresponding paragraph letters (A, B, etc.), the parties' views and proposals on all items in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f)(3), which includes the following topics:

(A) initial disclosures;
(B) subjects, timing, and potential phasing of ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.