Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gill v. Magan

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

August 29, 2019

NANCY GILL, Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL MAGAN, MICHAEL GONZALEZ, MIKE MANSUR, CITY OF SEATTLE, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, Defendant.

          Darryl Parker, WSBA #30770 Attorney for Plaintiff

          Susan Park, WSBA #53857 Ghazal Sharifi, WSBA #47750 Attorneys for Defendants City of Seattle, Michael Magan and Michael Gonzalez

          Marc Bides, WSBA #40496 Katherine Bosch, WSBA #43122 Attorneys for Defendants Mike Mansur and Snohomish County

          STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

          MARSHA J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

         Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information under seal.

         2. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL

         “Confidential” material shall include the following documents and tangible things produced or otherwise exchanged: (1) police personnel files (excluding personal financial, medical, psychological or family related materials, which will be redacted separately); (2) unsustained police internal investigations and disciplinary files; (3) unsustained complaints of police misconduct; (4) medical, psychological, and financial records of Plaintiffs or non-parties; (5) non-public tactical policies and procedures and training protocols; and (6) records that could implicate the privacy rights of the plaintiff or third parties, including, but not limited to, personal identifying information (“PII”) such as date(s) of birth, social security number(s), personal home address(es), phone number(s), and e-mails; driver's license or state identification number(s); personal financial information; passport information; immigration status; criminal history and/or criminal record number(s); and other unspecified PII.

         3. SCOPE

         The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material.

         However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise.

         4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL

         4.1 Basic Principles.

         A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement.

         4.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items.

         Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any confidential material only to:

(a) the receiving party's counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;
(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including in house counsel) of the receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, unless the parties agree that a particular document or material produced is for Attorney's Eyes Only and is so designated;
(c) experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.