Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Cedar Shakes and Shingles Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

September 4, 2019

In re Cedar Shakes and Shingles Antitrust Litigation This Document Relates to: ALL CLASS ACTIONS

          Mark A. Griffin, Raymond J. Farrow, Karin B. Swope, KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P. W. Joseph Bruckner Elizabeth R. Odette Brian D. Clark Arielle S. Wagner LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P. Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed End User Plaintiff Classes

          Gregory J Hollon, MCNAUL EBEL NAWROT & HELGREN PLLC Liaison Counsel for the Proposed Reseller Plaintiff Classes

          Kaleigh N.B. Powell, Kim D. Stephens, Jason Dennett, Chase C. Alvord, TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS Bonney Sweeney Samantha Stein James J. Pizzirusso Nathaniel C. Giddings Paul Gallagher HAUSFELD LLP Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Class

          Christopher J Cormier Warren T. Burns Spencer M Cox William B. Thompson Lydia A Wright BURNS CHAREST LLP Keith Dubanevich Keil M. Mueller Lydia Anderson-Dana STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHETER PC Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed Reseller Plaintiff Classes

          Jessica Walder, Larry Steven Gangnes, Heidi Brooks Bradley, Joseph Adamson, LANE POWELL PC Attorneys for Cedar Shake & Shingle Bureau

          Mathew L. Harrington, STOKES LAWRENCE Attorneys for Waldun Forest Products Ltd. and Waldun Forest Products Partnership d/b/a The Waldun Group

          Elizabeth Simson Weinstein, Molly A. Terwilliger, YARMUTH LLP Attorneys for Anbrook Industries Ltd.

          Laurie Lootens Jake Ewart Jessica C. Kerr, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON Attorneys for G&R Cedar Ltd. and G&R Cedar (2009) Ltd.

          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONCERNING EXPERT DISCOVERY

          MARSHA J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE.

         The parties in the above-captioned cases, [1] through their respective counsel of record, stipulate to the following regarding the scope of expert reports and discovery in the above-captioned matters and all other matters subsequently consolidated with them (collectively, the “Class Actions”), subject to approval by the Court.

         1. This Stipulation and Order Concerning Expert Discovery (“Stipulation”) does not set or alter the time for any disclosure required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) or the timing of any deadlines set forth in any operative scheduling orders entered in this case.

         2. To the extent that this Stipulation imposes limitations on discovery that would otherwise be available under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or this Court's standing orders, the parties have agreed to those limitations to increase the efficiency of their dealings with testifying experts and to minimize discovery disputes regarding testifying experts. Neither the terms of this Stipulation nor the parties' agreement to them shall be considered an admission by any party that any of the information restricted from discovery by this Stipulation would otherwise be discoverable or admissible.

         3. The following types of information shall not be the subject of any form of discovery and the parties shall not be obligated to preserve such information in any form or include such information on any privilege log:

(a) all written or oral communications in connection with this matter among and between the testifying expert and consultants, counsel, other experts for other parties in this matter, and/or staff or among any of these actors in ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.