United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle
In re Cedar Shakes and Shingles Antitrust Litigation This Document Relates to: ALL CLASS ACTIONS
A. Griffin, Raymond J. Farrow, Karin B. Swope, KELLER
ROHRBACK L.L.P. W. Joseph Bruckner Elizabeth R. Odette Brian
D. Clark Arielle S. Wagner LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P.
Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed End User Plaintiff Classes
Gregory J Hollon, MCNAUL EBEL NAWROT & HELGREN PLLC
Liaison Counsel for the Proposed Reseller Plaintiff Classes
Kaleigh N.B. Powell, Kim D. Stephens, Jason Dennett, Chase C.
Alvord, TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS Bonney Sweeney Samantha Stein
James J. Pizzirusso Nathaniel C. Giddings Paul Gallagher
HAUSFELD LLP Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed Direct
Purchaser Plaintiff Class
Christopher J Cormier Warren T. Burns Spencer M Cox William
B. Thompson Lydia A Wright BURNS CHAREST LLP Keith Dubanevich
Keil M. Mueller Lydia Anderson-Dana STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING
& SHLACHETER PC Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed Reseller
Jessica Walder, Larry Steven Gangnes, Heidi Brooks Bradley,
Joseph Adamson, LANE POWELL PC Attorneys for Cedar Shake
& Shingle Bureau
L. Harrington, STOKES LAWRENCE Attorneys for Waldun Forest
Products Ltd. and Waldun Forest Products Partnership d/b/a
The Waldun Group
Elizabeth Simson Weinstein, Molly A. Terwilliger, YARMUTH LLP
Attorneys for Anbrook Industries Ltd.
Lootens Jake Ewart Jessica C. Kerr, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN &
PETERSON Attorneys for G&R Cedar Ltd. and G&R Cedar
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONCERNING
J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE.
parties in the above-captioned cases,  through their
respective counsel of record, stipulate to the following
protocol regarding depositions in the above-captioned matters
and all other matters subsequently consolidated with them
(collectively, the “Class Actions”), subject to
approval by the Court. Nothing that occurred during the
negotiation of this Stipulation and Order can be used to
suggest a party's position on issues not included in the
Depositions in the S&W Action and the Class
(i) Plaintiffs in the Class Actions may attend, but not
participate in, depositions taken in S&W Forest
Products Ltd. v. Cedar Shake & Shingle Bureau et
al., No. 2:19-cv-00202-MJP (“the S&W
(ii) The depositions taken by the plaintiff in the S&W
Action will not count against the plaintiffs' deposition
limit in the Class Actions.
(iii) Counsel for the plaintiffs in the Class Actions are not
permitted to ask questions or raise objections during
depositions noticed by the parties in the S&W Action.
Plaintiffs in the Class Actions preserve all objections to
the testimony solicited in the S&W Action.
(iv) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the plaintiffs in the
Class Actions may use the depositions taken in the S&W
Action for any purpose whatsoever, including but not limited
to impeachment during depositions in the Class Actions and as
evidence at trial.
Multiple Depositions A witness may be deposed only
once in these Actions unless any of the following
(i) The witness was first deposed in the S&W Action, in
which case, that same witness may be deposed again in the
(ii) The witness properly revokes an earlier assertion of the
(iii) The witness refuses to answer a question on privilege
or other grounds and later withdraws the basis for refusing
to answer, or the basis for refusing to ...