Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Shake

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle

September 26, 2019

In re Cedar Shakes and Shingles Antitrust Litigation This Document Relates to ALL CLASS ACTIONS

          LANE POWELL PC Jessica Walder Larry Steven Gangnes Heidi Brooks Bradley joseph adamson Attorney's for cedar shake & Shingle Bureau

          MCNAUL EBEL NAWROT & HELGREN PLLC Christopher J. Cormier Gregory J Hollon, Liaison Counsel for the Proposed Reseller Plaintiff Classes BURNS CHAREST LLP Christopher J CormierBURNS CHAREST LLP Warren T. Burns Spencer M Cox William B. Thompson BURNS CHAREST LLP Lydia A Wright STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHETER PC Keith Dubanevich Keil M. Mueller Lydia Anderson-Dana co-lead counsel for the proposed reseller plaintiff Classes.

          KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P. Brian D. Clark (with consent) Mark A. Griffin, Raymond J. Farrow Karin B. Swope, LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P. W. Joseph Bruckner Elizabeth R. Odette Brian D. Clark Arielle S. Wagner Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed End User Plaintiff Classes Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed End User Plaintiff Classes

          YARMUTH LLP Elizabeth Simson Weinstein, Molly A. Terwilliger, Attorneys for Anbrook Industries Ltd.

          TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS Kaleigh N.B. Powell, Kim D. Stephens, Jason Dennett, HAUSFELD LLP Bonney Sweeney Samantha Stein. HAUSFELD LLP James J. Pizzirusso Nathaniel C. Giddings Paul Gallagher Co-Lead Counsel for the Proposed Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Class

          STOKES LAWRENCE Mathew L. Harrington, Fifth Avenue, Attorneys for Waldun Forest Products Ltd. and Waldun Forest Products Partnership d/b/a The Waldun Group HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON Jake Ewart Laurie Lootens Chyz, Jake Ewart, Jessica C. Kerr, Attorneys for G&R Cedar Ltd. and G&R Cedar (2009) Ltd.

          STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

          MARSHA J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

         Whereas, Plaintiffs in each of the Class Actions filed Amended Complaints on August 27, 2019;

         Whereas, pursuant to the Parties’ Joint Status Report, filed on July 24, 2019, Defendants intend to move to dismiss the three Amended Complaints on September 27, 2019;

         Whereas, under the default rules, each defendant would be entitled to file separate, 24-page motions as to each Amended Complaint, and plaintiffs in each action would be entitled to file separate, 24-page responses to each motion to dismiss; and

         Whereas, the Court has directed that the parties avoid duplicative briefing on overlapping issues wherever possible;

         Now therefore, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 10(g), the parties file this stipulated motion seeking the Court’s Order that:

         Defendants shall file a single, omnibus motion to dismiss all three Amended ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.